IT security audit
A cross-functional view of security controls, their operating evidence and the decisions needed to reduce risk.

CYBERSECURITY AUDIT / ATLANT SECURITY
Understand how your security controls work in practice. Turn policies, platform settings and operating records into a clear, prioritised assessment.
Know which controls are supported by evidence, where the gaps remain and what management needs to do next.
An audit becomes useful when each conclusion can be traced to an agreed criterion, an assessment procedure and a dated record. Our scope starts with the decision your organisation needs to make.
Bring governance, identity, cloud and operational controls into a defined review. Separate design gaps, operating exceptions and evidence limitations so the report supports proportionate action.
Explore the assessment02 / FOCUSED WORKSTREAMS
A cross-functional view of security controls, their operating evidence and the decisions needed to reduce risk.
Review tenant security, privileged access, conditional access and collaboration controls against an agreed baseline.
Assess cloud governance, identity, logging, exposure and recovery evidence across selected AWS, Azure or Google Cloud environments.
Examine identity lifecycle, privileged access, service accounts and access-review evidence across your selected directories.
Assess whether security policy, risk ownership and management reporting support timely and accountable decisions.
Review whether escalation, response authority and recovery arrangements are supported by usable evidence.
Assess oversight, access and evidence responsibilities for selected critical technology suppliers.
Review change approval, release controls, secrets ownership and security evidence through selected development workflows.

A conclusion you can trace.
A plan you can act on.
Identify the decision, criteria, entities and assessment period.
Agree populations, sample selection and controlled access.
Connect policy, configuration and operating records.
Resolve factual questions and state risk and limitations.
Assign accountable actions and define closure evidence.
A configured control and a consistently operating control are different conclusions.
Our assessment scope distinguishes current settings from evidence over time. Missing records, exclusions and sample limits stay visible alongside the findings.
Control assessment and readiness work do not themselves confer certification, a statutory opinion or a guarantee of compliance.
THE ASTERION GROUP AG SAMPLE
A 32-page fictional cybersecurity audit: ten detailed findings, architecture and evidence-flow diagrams, reproducible sample selections and a practical remediation plan.
Read eight sample pagesCriteria, procedures, populations and evidence references.
Observed conditions, risk, limitations and closure criteria.
Dependencies, accountable actions and a sequenced roadmap.
04 / INSIGHTS & GUIDES

Understand what control evidence and exploitation testing each establish, and how to combine them deliberately.
Read the perspective
Tie evidence requests to criteria, owners, periods and secure handling instead of collecting everything.
Read the perspective
Prepare useful tenant, privileged-access, conditional-access and lifecycle evidence for a scoped assessment.
Read the perspectivePREPARE THE FIRST CONVERSATION
Bring the inputs that change the assessment scope.

LET’S START A CONVERSATION
Your audit objectives, control boundaries and evidence period. A useful starting point for your assessment.
Discuss your requirements